On Dissent : Its Meaning in America
By: Collins, Ronald K.L | Skover, David M.
Publisher: Cambridge University Press 2015Description: 200, pp.ISBN: 9781107502680.Subject(s): Judicial opinions | Dissenting opinions | Dissenters--Legal status, laws, etc | United States | Government, Resistance toDDC classification: 322.40973 Summary: America values dissent. It tolerates, encourages and protects it. But what is this thing we value? That is a question never asked. 'Dissent' is treated as a known fact. For all that has been said about it - in books, articles, judicial opinions, and popular culture - it is remarkable that no one has devoted much, if any, ink to explaining what dissent is. No one has attempted to sketch its philosophical, linguistic, legal or cultural meanings or usages. There is a need to develop some clarity about this phenomenon, for not every difference of opinion, symbolic gesture, public activity in opposition to government policy, incitement to direct action, revolutionary effort or political assassination need be tagged dissent. In essence, we have no conceptual yardstick. It is just that measure of meaning that On Dissent offers.| Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books
|
NASSDOC Library | 322.40973 COL-O (Browse shelf) | Available | 51531 |
Browsing NASSDOC Library Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| 322.40954 ANI-S Science of satyagraha | 322.40954 GAN- Gandhian way: peace, non-violence and empowerment | 322.40954 STR- Struggle against the state: social network and protest mobilization in India | 322.40973 COL-O On Dissent | 322.409861 BRI-R Revolutionary social change in Colombia: the origin and direction of the FARC-EP | 322.42 FRA-M The Muslim brotherhood and the west: | 322.42 MAO- Maoist Insurgency, State and People: |
America values dissent. It tolerates, encourages and protects it. But what is this thing we value? That is a question never asked. 'Dissent' is treated as a known fact. For all that has been said about it - in books, articles, judicial opinions, and popular culture - it is remarkable that no one has devoted much, if any, ink to explaining what dissent is. No one has attempted to sketch its philosophical, linguistic, legal or cultural meanings or usages. There is a need to develop some clarity about this phenomenon, for not every difference of opinion, symbolic gesture, public activity in opposition to government policy, incitement to direct action, revolutionary effort or political assassination need be tagged dissent. In essence, we have no conceptual yardstick. It is just that measure of meaning that On Dissent offers.
There are no comments for this item.