Negotiating climate change : a forensic analysis / Aynsley Kellow (Professor Emeritus of Government, University of Tasmania, Australia).
By: Kellow, Aynsley J. (Aynsley John) [author.].
Publisher: UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2018Description: vii, 173 pages.ISBN: 9781786438201.Subject(s): Climatic changes -- Government policy | Climatic changes -- Law and legislation | Climatic changes | Environmental policy -- International cooperationDDC classification: 363.70526 Summary: This book examines how an error in global meta-policy set climate change negotiations on an unproductive course. The decision to base negotiations on the Montreal Protocol and overlook the importance of interests, it argues, institutionalised an approach doomed to fail. By analysing interests, science and norms in the process, and the neglect of 'interactive minilateralism', learning was delayed until the more promising Paris Agreement was finally concluded, only to encounter a Trump Presidency, which (ironically) might offer further learning opportunities.Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books | NASSDOC Library | 363.70526 KEL-N (Browse shelf) | Available | 52087 |
Browsing NASSDOC Library Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | ||||||||
363.700973 SHU-; Land that could be: environmentalism and democracy in the twenty-first century | 363.701561 ESS- Essential concepts of global environmental governance / | 363.7052 ADV- Advancing environmental justice for marginalized communities in India : | 363.70526 KEL-N Negotiating climate change : | 363.70526 THA-H Handbook of globalization and the environment | 363.70526 THO-; NGO diplomacy: the influence of NGOs in international environmental negotiations | 363.705610952 ARI-E Evaluation of Japanese environmental regulations |
This book examines how an error in global meta-policy set climate change negotiations on an unproductive course. The decision to base negotiations on the Montreal Protocol and overlook the importance of interests, it argues, institutionalised an approach doomed to fail. By analysing interests, science and norms in the process, and the neglect of 'interactive minilateralism', learning was delayed until the more promising Paris Agreement was finally concluded, only to encounter a Trump Presidency, which (ironically) might offer further learning opportunities.
There are no comments for this item.